1 million people vote to revoke Article 50
 |
21st March 2019 the people seem restless
Whilst the government do have to debate this - it will be interesting to see what transpires
|
Thursday, March 21, 2019
1 million people vote to revoke Article 50
Thursday, March 14, 2019
What does Democracy Mean - Brexit - The People's Vote
The word democracy describes a political system. "In a democratic
country, all eligible citizens have the right to participate, either
directly or indirectly, in making the decisions that affect them."
So Cameron said 'let the people vote in a referendum'
The people voted and which ever way you look at it it was close with leave just winning.
Was this a democratic vote - Sort of - if the campaign to leave or remain had been fact checked, based on sound knowledge and correctly policed then yes it would have been democratic - but it wasn't.
One of the major criticisms of the Brexit campaign was the number of misleading or false claims.
Both sides were accused of running deeply flawed campaigns with spurious reports such as money flooding back to the NHS in the event of Brexit.
Members from different political parties joined together to create a 'dream list' of how the UK would be out of the EU - financially, ethically, and morally and people bought into the dream.
Remainers could only fight for what there was/is - difficult when the people are feeling disengaged especially after years of austerity and terrorism.
So what is Brexit? That really is the million dollar question. Brexit is different things to different people.
Its:
If you look at two years of Brexit, time wasted on elections solely to gain more control (less democracy), poor negotiations, a 'deal' that quite frankly a child could have written in less time and that pleases no-one, its difficult to see how anyone will or can ever be satisfied that 'Brexit has been delivered'
In my opinion - it is democratic to have a second clear well articulated referendum, with a proper fact based campaign (or no campaign) - a democratic vote - and yes I believe the option to revoke Article 50 should be included within that vote.
More information:
wiki/Campaigning_in_the_2016_
www.independent.co.uk
So Cameron said 'let the people vote in a referendum'
The people voted and which ever way you look at it it was close with leave just winning.
| ||||||
One of the major criticisms of the Brexit campaign was the number of misleading or false claims.
Both sides were accused of running deeply flawed campaigns with spurious reports such as money flooding back to the NHS in the event of Brexit.
- 'The money saved from leaving the EU will result in the NHS getting £350m a week'
- 'A free-trade deal with the EU will be 'the easiest thing in human history'
- ‘Two thirds of British jobs in manufacturing are dependent on demand from Europe’
- 'Turkey is going to join the EU and millions of people will flock to the UK'
- 'Brexit will lead to Scotland renewing calls for independence'
- 'Brexit does not mean the UK will leave the single market '
 |
| Which way to go? |
Vote Leave broke electoral law and British democracy is shaken. Vote Leave has been fined £61,000 after being found guilty of breaking electoral law during the Brexit campaign....
Members from different political parties joined together to create a 'dream list' of how the UK would be out of the EU - financially, ethically, and morally and people bought into the dream.
Remainers could only fight for what there was/is - difficult when the people are feeling disengaged especially after years of austerity and terrorism.
So what is Brexit? That really is the million dollar question. Brexit is different things to different people.
Its:
- 'going back to how things were before'
- 'less migration'
- 'being great again'
- 'more control'
- 'Free trade'
- 'more money for the NHS'
- 'prosperity'
If you look at two years of Brexit, time wasted on elections solely to gain more control (less democracy), poor negotiations, a 'deal' that quite frankly a child could have written in less time and that pleases no-one, its difficult to see how anyone will or can ever be satisfied that 'Brexit has been delivered'
In my opinion - it is democratic to have a second clear well articulated referendum, with a proper fact based campaign (or no campaign) - a democratic vote - and yes I believe the option to revoke Article 50 should be included within that vote.
More information:
wiki/Campaigning_in_the_2016_
www.independent.co.uk
Sunday, March 3, 2019
Vaccination - what are the risks? (Part Two)
So you have had your pet vaccinated.. what can happen now?
Shedding
These vaccines can be shed in feces and urine for weeks after vaccination. Studies on dogs vaccinated with CPV-2 parvo-virus show that the virus can remain in the blood stream and be shed via feces for as long as three to four weeks after vaccination. This means these diseases can be spread through vaccination.
(It is known that vaccinated children shed the virus for a few days after vaccination (through sneezing or coughing). However, the vaccine virus is weakened, and so it is much less able to spread from person to person than flu viruses that circulate during the flu season.)
Over vaccination:
Annual vaccination is unnecessary and dangerous for your dog. And despite what we know about the risks, it seems to be on the rise.Full Article: dogsnaturallymagazine.com
Table : Minimum Duration of Immunity for Canine Vaccines (Dogs Naturally magazine)
| ||||
Vaccine
|
Minimum Duration of Immunity
|
Methods Used to Determine Immunity
| ||
CORE VACCINES
| ||||
| Canine Distemper Virus (CDV) | ||||
| Rockbom Strain | 7 yrs / 15 yrs | challenge / serology | ||
| Onderstepoort Strain | 5 yrs / 9 yrs | challenge / serology | ||
| Canine Adenovirus-2 (CAV-2) | 7 yrs / 9 yrs | challenge-CAV-1 / serology | ||
| Canine Parvovirus-2 (CAV-2) | 7 yrs | challenge / serology |
Vets are over vaccinating at the detriment of pet health.
Dr Shults reports:
“The patient receives no benefit and may be placed at serious risk when an unnecessary vaccine is given. Few or no scientific studies have demonstrated a need for cats or dogs to be revaccinated.”
Cancer
As far as Big Pharmaceuticals are concerned, a fool and his money are easily parted, and pet owners are proving as easy to swindle as young parents.Just like vaccinations for humans, the number of scheduled vaccinations cats and dogs now receive has gone through the roof compared to previous generations.
Unsurprisingly, domestic cats and dogs have never suffered as many health problems as they do now.
“22,000 cats develop cancer at the site of vaccination every year in the USA. American cats are now being vaccinated in the tail or leg so that they can cut it off when it becomes cancerous,” says https://www.doglistener.co.uk/ That is abhorrent!
Cancer in domestic cats has now reached epidemic proportions. The vaccine industry claims “correlation does not imply causation”, but a degree of common sense is needed here.
How many tails and legs must be amputated before Vets will begin to admit the vaccinations they are pushing are high-risk?
If these figures aren’t telling enough, a further study claims that “Sixty-six per cent of all sick dogs start being sick within three months of vaccination.”
And compromised immune systems are just the start. Vaccines are also responsible for causing a range of chronic diseases to take hold, among them autoimmune haemolytic anaemia, thyroid disease, arthritis and parvovirus. Vaccines can even make your dog autistic.
Vets, pressured by vaccine companies to continually increase profits, are over-vaccinating our pets. Annual vaccines have become normalised when most vaccines are actually designed to last for at least seven years. Vaccination forms a significant part of Vet Practice turnover.
The vaccine industry is now so powerful that Vets are being punished for daring to treat animals on a case-by-case basis.taken from https://newspunch.com/study-pet-death-cancer/
 |
| Warning signs |
Additional reading: Its not just pets who are suffering:
Human vaccines kill people..https://www.naturalblaze.com/
Su..
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)